You're offline — showing the last version we saved.

Every firm owner rewriting their website hits the same box on the wireframe: the pricing page. Put numbers on it and you worry about competitors, anchoring and price shoppers. Leave them off and you look evasive to buyers who expect a price before they call.

The right answer for your firm falls out of three things: the kind of work you sell, the enquiries you want to stop, and how standardised your scoping really is. This piece works through each and ends with a checklist. It contains no figures: what you charge is your call.

What a pricing page is actually for

A pricing page does two jobs at once. It filters, and it persuades. Most firms design it for the second job and forget the first.

The filter job is the more valuable one. Every discovery call with a prospect who was never going to pay your prices costs a partner hour. A page that makes your approach clear before the call lets wrong-fit enquiries rule themselves out. You get fewer enquiries and better ones.

Every discovery call with a prospect who was never going to pay your prices costs a partner hour.

Trent McLaren, in this article

So start with a blunt question: which enquiries do you currently waste time on? If the answer is “people who want the cheapest tax return in town”, visible prices will stop them. If the answer is “businesses that are too small for our advisory model”, a clear minimum engagement description may do more than any number.

The trade-offs, honestly weighed

Filtering out wrong-fit enquiries

This is the strongest argument for publishing. A prospect who sees how you price and still books a call has already accepted the frame. The risk is the reverse filter: a good-fit client who sees a starting point, assumes their situation costs the same, and leaves because it looks too high or too low for what they need.

Anchoring

Anchoring is the well-documented tendency for the first number a person sees to pull their later judgement towards it (Tversky and Kahneman described it in Science in 1974). On a pricing page, a starting-from figure becomes the number prospects expect to pay, however clearly you say “from”. Every later quote is measured against it.

Competitors seeing it

They will. That matters less than owners fear, because a competitor copying your number does not copy your delivery or your client experience. If price is the only thing that differentiates you, the pricing page is not your real problem.

Commoditising advisory work

This is the strongest argument against. Once a service has a line on a price list, clients compare it line by line. That suits compliance work with a defined output. It damages advisory work, where the value depends on the client’s situation and the price should follow the value. Listing “CFO services from X a month” invites the buyer to treat judgement as a commodity.

Listing “CFO services from X a month” invites the buyer to treat judgement as a commodity.

Trent McLaren, in this article

AI answer engines and buyer expectations

More prospects now ask an AI assistant which firms suit them and how accountants in their area charge. An assistant can only work with what is public. If your site says nothing about how you price, the assistant fills the gap from someone else’s page. We have seen no reliable research quantifying this for accounting firms, so treat it as a reason to explain your model clearly, not proof that numbers are mandatory.

The four positions on the spectrum

PositionWhat the page showsBest atMain risk
No pricesServices and a contact formKeeping every engagement bespokeLooks evasive; high share of wrong-fit calls
“How we charge” explainedPricing model, drivers, process and payment terms, no numbersFiltering by approach without anchoringNeeds good writing to feel concrete
Starting-from packagesTiered packages with an entry pointFiltering by budget in volume workAnchoring; complex clients assume the entry price
Calculator or quote toolA price generated from the prospect’s inputsHigh-volume standardised workOnly as good as your scoping rules

The calculator end only works if your scoping is genuinely rule-based. If a partner routinely overrides the number after the first call, a public calculator creates a promise you then break. Proposal tools such as Ignition can generate a price from structured inputs, but the rules behind it are yours to design and test first.

Which position fits which firm

  • Compliance-heavy volume firms (individual returns, sole traders, standard bookkeeping) usually gain most from visible starting points or a quote tool. The work is defined, the buyer compares on price anyway, and filtering at scale saves the most time.
  • Advisory-led firms are usually better served by a “how we charge” page. You want prospects to understand that price follows scope and outcome, and a number on the page undercuts that conversation.
  • Niche firms (a single industry, a single client type) can often do both: package the recurring compliance core for that niche and explain the advisory layer in words. Because your clients look alike, your scoping is more predictable than a generalist’s, which is what makes packages safe.

Many firms land on a hybrid: packages for the defined work, a written explanation for everything else. That is a legitimate answer as long as the page is clear about which is which.

How to write a “how we charge” page with no numbers

A good no-numbers page answers every question a buyer would ask except the final figure. Cover these, in plain words:

A good no-numbers page answers every question a buyer would ask except the final figure.

Trent McLaren, in this article
  1. Your model. Fixed price agreed upfront, monthly subscription, or project-based. Say which, and say that you do not bill by the hour if you don’t.
  2. What drives the price. Number of entities, transaction volume, state of the books, payroll, deadlines. Prospects can then estimate their own complexity.
  3. When they get a price. “You get a fixed written quote after a free scoping call, before any work starts” is concrete and reassuring.
  4. What is included and what is not. Name the usual extras so nothing surprises anyone later.
  5. How and when they pay. Upfront, monthly, or on milestones. If you collect before you deliver, say so here. Our piece on getting paid upfront covers the options.
  6. Who you are not for. One honest sentence filters better than a paragraph of positioning.

If you are still working out the pricing model itself, start there before the page. Our session on value pricing bookkeeping and annual accounts is a practical place to begin, and it is worth reading what clients read when they search accountant costs so your page answers the questions they arrive with.

For your practice

What it means for your fees

The work it creates

A pricing decision for each service, a page that explains the model, and scoping rules firm enough that anything you publish is honest for most clients.

How to scope it

Split your services into those with a defined output and those that depend on the client’s situation. Package the first; explain the second in words.

How to price it

Start from the model, not the number: fixed upfront, subscription or project. If you show a starting point, check that most clients actually pay it, and measure discovery-call-to-proposal conversion for a quarter before and after the change.

For the client letter

You get a fixed written quote after a free scoping call, before any work starts.

The rules on advertising fees

Whatever you publish, it must not mislead. The main sources, checked in September 2026:

  • Australia. The Australian Consumer Law prohibits false or misleading representations about price. The ACCC’s price display guidance says that if a business shows a price for one part of a service, the total price must be at least as prominent. A “from” figure that almost no client actually pays is the kind of claim that invites trouble. APES 110 (R115.2) requires members marketing their services to be honest and truthful, with no exaggerated claims and no disparaging references or unsubstantiated comparisons to the work of others, and encourages members in doubt to consult their professional body.
  • United States. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct (1.600.010) treats promotion as false, misleading or deceptive if, among other things, it represents that services will be performed for a stated fee, estimated fee or fee range when it was likely the fees would be substantially increased and the prospect was not told. State board rules may add requirements, so check yours.
  • United Kingdom. The Provision of Services Regulations 2009 require a provider to make its price available where it is pre-determined for a given type of service and, where it is not, to supply the price, the method of calculating it or a sufficiently detailed estimate on request. ICAEW’s marketing guidance asks members to take great care that any reference to fees or charging rates does not mislead, including stating time periods and exclusions.

A “from” figure that almost no client actually pays is the kind of claim that invites trouble.

Trent McLaren, in this article

This is a summary for orientation, not legal advice. Check your professional body’s current code and take advice if you are unsure about a specific claim.

How to test your pricing page

Pick one measure before you change anything: the share of discovery calls that turn into proposals is usually the most telling. Record it for a quarter, change the page, record it for another. If enquiries fall but conversion rises, the filter is working. If both fall, the page is scaring off good-fit clients.

Ask every new client at onboarding: “What did our website tell you about how we charge, and was anything missing?” For the wider picture of how the pricing page fits your site and lead flow, see our accounting firm marketing guide.

A decision checklist

  • Which enquiries do we currently waste time on, and would a visible price stop them?
  • Is our scoping rule-based enough that a published starting point is honest for most clients?
  • Which services have a defined output, and which depend on the client’s situation?
  • Does the page explain our model, price drivers, quoting process and payment terms?
  • Could any figure we show be read as a price most clients will pay when they won’t?
  • Have we checked the page against our professional body’s code and consumer law?
  • What will we measure, and when will we review it?

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to publish prices on my accounting firm website?

Not as a general rule in Australia or the US. In the UK, the Provision of Services Regulations 2009 require price information to be available where a price is pre-determined, and a price, method or estimate to be supplied on request otherwise. Check the current version of the rules for your jurisdiction.

Will publishing prices bring in cheaper clients?

It changes who contacts you. Visible prices draw buyers who compare on price, and let those who find you too expensive leave quietly instead of taking a meeting. Whether that nets out well depends on your work mix.

Can I show prices for some services and not others?

Yes, and many firms should. Package the work with a defined output and explain the rest in words. Label the page clearly so a prospect knows which services have a set price and which are quoted after scoping.

Should I include GST or sales tax in any price I show?

In Australia, the ACCC’s guidance says a displayed total price must include taxes such as GST. Rules differ elsewhere, so state clearly whether any figure includes tax and check the requirement where you operate.

How often should I review my pricing page?

Whenever your pricing model, service mix or ideal client changes, and at least when you run your annual price review. A page that describes last year’s model is worse than a page with no prices at all.

Sponsored

Abby — compliance automation and workpapers for busy accountants. Start your free 30-day trial.

PricingFixed PricingFirm WebsiteMarketingProfessional StandardsClient Acquisition

Was this useful?
Thanks — noted.

Sponsored

Vinyl
Read next
Related